This is an appendix to our post “The Rural-Urban Divide is Clear, but Major Policy Change May Have to Wait.” Read the full post here.
Minnesota Senate |
|
2016 |
2012 |
|
GOP |
DFL |
GOP |
DFL |
Rural |
21(+6) |
6(-6) |
15 |
12 |
Urban |
13(+1) |
27(-1) |
12 |
28 |
|
Outstate |
22(+7) |
7(-7) |
15 |
14 |
Metro |
12(0) |
26(0) |
12 |
26 |
Minnesota House of Representatives |
|
2016 |
2014 |
2012 |
|
GOP |
DFL |
GOP |
DFL |
GOP |
DFL |
Rural |
44(+1) |
9(-2) |
43(+11) |
11(-11) |
32 |
22 |
Urban |
32(+3) |
48(-3) |
29(+2) |
51(-2) |
27 |
53 |
|
Outstate |
43(+1) |
16(-2) |
42(+12) |
18(-12) |
30 |
30 |
Metro |
33(+3) |
41(-3) |
30(+1) |
44(-1) |
29 |
45 |
Like this:
Like Loading...
One thought on “Appendix: Change in GOP-DFL Legislative Seats by Rural/Urban & Outstate/Metro”